Hello Matthew,
Tuesday, December 7, 2004, 7:32:22 AM, you wrote:
MN> Hello,
MN> I've recently installed SA 3.0.1, and found some junk was
MN> getting through with scores too low for my liking, especially before the
MN> URLs made it into SURBL. I've put together a few rules to match some
MN> of these that you might find interesting.
My mass-check results on your rules:
Section 3 -- Frequencies Log
(First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies)
OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O RANK SCORE NAME
95120 59679 35441 0.627 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
2231 2231 0 1.000 1.00 0.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB1
3331 3330 1 0.999 0.90 0.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY1
470 470 0 1.000 0.86 2.00 UOLCC_WATCH_BODY
19 19 0 1.000 0.45 1.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY2
0 0 0 0.500 0.31 3.50 UOLCC_HTM_HTML_URL
0 0 0 0.500 0.31 1.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB2
66 37 29 0.431 0.10 0.10 UOLCC_CAPWORD_TEST
136 51 85 0.263 0.00 2.00 UOLCC_BBONE
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
95120 59679 35441 0.627 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
100.000 62.7407 37.2593 0.627 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
2.345 3.7383 0.0000 1.000 1.00 0.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB1
3.502 5.5799 0.0028 0.999 0.90 0.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY1
0.494 0.7875 0.0000 1.000 0.86 2.00 UOLCC_WATCH_BODY
0.020 0.0318 0.0000 1.000 0.45 1.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_BODY2
0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.31 3.50 UOLCC_HTM_HTML_URL
0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.31 1.50 UOLCC_ROLEX_SUB2
0.069 0.0620 0.0818 0.431 0.10 0.10 UOLCC_CAPWORD_TEST
0.143 0.0855 0.2398 0.263 0.00 2.00 UOLCC_BBONE
The single words Rolex in subject and/or body are the best hitters,
but then nobody in my domains discusses buying Rolex watches as
birthday or anniversary presents.
Bob Menschel
