Hi Alan,
I found out the hard way about this problem as well. Here's the response I got previously on this issue:
| Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/19/2005 01:02 PM |
|
Leonard
know issue with sa 3.0x and spamc/spamd. Will ne Fixed with 3.10
work around is lower number of children allowed or apply following patches..
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
| Alan Shine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/01/2005 06:27 AM |
|
Hi,
I'm new to SA, and currently testing it in order to integrate it with our systems.
The performance appears to be very bad - 6 messages per second.
I'm running SA 3.0.1 on DL380 - dual CPU, hyper thread, 4G RAM, with Redhat 8.
spamd is running with the rules engine only, and with most of the rules from SARE, beside bigevil.
The CPU is in 0% idle most of the time, and I have 3 spamc proccesses on the same machine. (when I run this with Java application instead of spamc I receive the same results).
and my question is - are 6 messages per second the avarage rate of SA, if not - what can I do in order to improve it.
Regards,
Alan
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
