I'm running a dozen servers with postfix, amavisd-new, and sa3.0.2. I'm having
no problems whatsoever with any aspect of the system, including BerkeleyDB. I
just want to throw that in to let people know it's quite possible to run a
stable system with amavisd-new.
RO
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Ott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 1/31/2005 7:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org'
Cc:
Subject: RE: [OT] Replacement for amavisd-new?
We are moving from mailscanner to amavisd-new because of lots more
flexibility. Currently we are running sendmail to amavisd-new to
sendmail to
dbmail, is working great processing about 120,000 messages a day broke
out
over 2 servers and a database server for dbmail. Initially we had some
hang-ups do to BerkeleyDB but in the new version of amavisd-new you can
turn
off BerkeleyDB and that solved all of the issues we were having with it.
Andrew
Action Communications
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael W Cocke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OT] Replacement for amavisd-new?
A serious bug seems to have crept into amavis somewhere, or maybe
BerkeleyDB
- stability has gone to hell. In any case, I'm starting to think about
replacing Amavisd. I can't afford to futz around with my email server -
it
needs to work.
Currently I run postfix, amavisd, spamassassin, clam & fprot (most
recent
stable versions of all).
Recommendations?
Thanks!
Mike-
--
Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive.
--
Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed
site-wide
spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try
non-HTML,
non-encoded, non-attachments.
