Are you referring to whats in the spamd line? Currently it is m10 Hmm I thought that was max con per child, so where do I edit that value?
Thanks Robert > 3.0.2 is better than 3.0.1 in this regard, so the first thing I'd do is > upgrade. > > That may not be a complete solution, so if you are using spamd, I'd > set ---max_con_per_child to something reasonably low, like 20..50 or so. > > There are still a couple of things that can eat memory and already have > bugs > assigned, so will probably be fixed in a while. But limiting the number > of > connections per spamd child should help a lot. > > Also with spamd, what is the max number of children? With your low email > rate, I'd probably limit the number of children to 4..5 or so, probably no > more than 10. > > Loren > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 8:53 AM > Subject: Memory problems with SA 3.0.1? > > >> Are there any memory problems for SA version 3.0.1? We recently upgraded >> to 2 gigs of memory on the server and SA just gobbled up the memory. We >> dip down to under 20 megs here and there and 30-40 megs the rest of the >> time. I lowered the number of processes from 15 to 10 and according to >> top >> the RSS is reading at least 50 megs per process. >> >> When I stop and start SA I obviously gain back a lot of memory, but soon >> goes back down. Im running this on Fedora Core 2 with qmail, I average >> 25-35 emails a minute with spikes to 300 emails a minute. I just dont >> know >> if SA is suppose to take up that much memory. >> >> Any suggestions on what to look for? Or is there like a memory leak in >> this version? >> >> Thanks >> Robert Bartlett >> Digital Phoenix > >
