This server is only processing a small amount of email comparatively, perhaps a few thousand a day. I haven't got around to setting up MRTG on it.
I have however passed the URL across to another sysadmin at the company who is running our main SA+Qmail server, which easily does 100k+ of email a day. Thanks again, Darren > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 January 2005 09:53 > To: SpamAssassin Users > Subject: Re: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp > rules > > On Thursday, January 13, 2005, 1:19:58 AM, Darren Coleman wrote: > >> From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> % dig 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a > >> > >> ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a > >> ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > >> ;; got answer: > >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65527 > >> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 15, ADDITIONAL: 13 > >> ;; QUERY SECTION: > >> ;; 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org, type = A, class = IN > >> > >> ;; ANSWER SECTION: > >> 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org. 2H IN A 127.0.0.2 > > > Yes, I get that result :) > > [..] > > > I presume this is intended behaviour when the dig statement above works. > > As it happens I am also seeing URIBL_SBL hits in my spam now so > > obviously it is querying the RBL correctly. > > You should be all set then. > > The only remaining question is how much mail volume your server > is doing. If you're processing more than a hundred thousand > messages per day you should probably request rsync access for > the RBLs you use. For example: > > http://www.surbl.org/rsync-signup.html > > Jeff C. > -- > Jeff Chan > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.surbl.org/
