> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:19 AM > To: werner detter; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: spamassassin + filter.sh > > > At 11:06 AM 1/11/2005, werner detter wrote: > >i know that in the future i will have to use spamd/spamc but at the > >moment i can't migrate because of several reasons. that's > why i have to > >get 'filter.sh' modified in the way that only mails smaller > 100 kb are > >passed through spamassassin. > > Well, the modification of filter.sh might be harder than the > migration to > spamd.... > > What's inhibiting you from migrating to spamd? Perhaps we can > help make > that easier for you.
I'm really new to Postfix so I'm reading this thread with a lot of interest. I took a look at the Wiki and didn't see anything that addressed my concern. According to some of the doc related to implementing SA on the Postfix.org site, the example shown involved calling SA and not spamc. Apparently, the problem with this method is that if the spamassassin call fails, then Postfix won't process the message at all. So, I'm looking for pointers on using spamd/spamc with Postfix that won't cause delivery problems if there are operational problems with SA. TIA! Joe K.
