I will be sticking with 2.64 for a while as well. -----Original Message----- From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:42 AM Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: maintaining the 2.6 branch
Another reason.... I've been doing some testing ove the last couple of days with 3.02 and found it's scores are way lower on all test emails than 2.64. (anywhere upto 33% lower in limited tests). I've managed to get most of my 2.64 rules etc over (along with bayes), but I'm nervous about switching given the amount of spam 2.64 IS catching vs 3.02 MIGHT miss. Alot of the defaults rules have reduced scores (esp when running bayes+net combination) and I don't want to give my users the spam. I've seen several other people that complain/note this issue as well so it seems I'm not alone on this. I shall be sticking to 2.64 for the forsee-able future as 3.02 gives me no advantage and quite a high likelihood of more spam dropping through the system! -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 Per Jessen wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > >>>Per Jessen wrote: >>> >>>> Show of hands, >>>>who's still on 2.64 with no exact plans to upgrade? > > > Alright, so far I've seen 4-5, maybe 6 people saying they intend to stick to > 2.64 for the foreseeable future. Is that really all? > I'm quite willing myself to put an effort in in maintaining 2.64, and I'll > probably be doing it on a personal level anyway, but to work to produce actual > releases for others, I think a bit more of an interest is needed. > > > ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. **********************************************************************
