On Friday, January 7, 2005, 1:33:49 AM, Daniel Kleinsinger wrote: > Is JP now separate from WS? I currently score it as 1.5 or something > because anything hitting JP would hit WS too. On the surbl webpage it > says it's not separate yet, but the score below makes me think maybe it is.
JP is still added into WS, but they will be separated when SpamAssassin 3.1 comes out. > And to stay on topic, of the 52,180 spams tagged or deleted by my mail > server in the last 2 weeks, 41,505 hit one or more SURBL for a nice > round 80% spam hit rate. Compare that to the following hit rates and it > seems SURBL are doing their jobs quite nicely. Thanks and > congratulations to everyone involved. Note that I score Bayes_99 at 8 > points whereas the network tests below get 3-5 points so Bayes gets a > bit of an advantage from that. However, SURBL are unmatched at pushing > scores towards my delete threshold of 25. Since the inception of SURBL > I delete a much higher percentage of spam. Less spam delivered makes me > and my users happy. > 48,528 Bayes_99 93% > 38,102 Razor 73% > 29,434 DCC 56% > 28,157 Spamcop RBL 54% > 23,666 XBL RBL 45% On behalf of everyone helping out with the SURBL project, thanks for sharing your kind words and good results! Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
