Loren Wilton wrote:

When my MimeDefang/Spamassassin system tags a message as spam, it adds
the Spamassassin report as an attachment to the original message.

Can somebody confirm for me that it would be a BAD idea to feed these MD
modified messages to sa-learn?



No, it wouldn't be a bad idea. SA knows how to remove its own markup.

Where you get into trouble is when you forward a spam to a mailbox to feed
to SA. SA won't know to remove the last forwarding step in the spam.


Ok I understand that SA can remove it's own markup and i also note the configuration option bayes_header_ignore,
but the markup from Mimedefang is not SA's own markup.


maybe some experimentation is in order.
thanks.



Reply via email to