>-----Original Message----- >From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:23 PM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: RE: Interesting NW article > > >Well, from our implementation I would say that this article is >junk. We >are running SA with pretty much default config and no Bayes and are >getting about 97% with the only FPs being some mass mailings from >vendors (MS Technet for example). If we looked at turning on >Bayes then >this product would probably be the best out there. > >This quote "SpamAssassin requires a significant amount of integration >work to make an enterprise-class installation succeed" is bs, >we did the >upgrade from 2.64 which worked great and have not seen any issues and >the amount of work to implement was about an hour. > >So keep up the great work guys and ignore these "technical" reviews.
Completely agree. We don't use Bayes, and we catch 99%. Who did these people contact? SA is not that difficult at all to integrate. I think they confuse the abondance of options, as difficult. --Chris
