On Sunday 12 December 2004 9:10 pm, Robert Menschel wrote: Thanks for your comments on my rulesets, it was just the guidance that I needed. My rulesets up until your comments were based on my ideas, so that should answer any of your questions.
> My next release of HEAD, GENL_SUBJ, and URI should wipe out the Rolex > and similar (Genuine Replica!) spams. Specific is the best tool > against the male pills spam, but some are even slipping through here > until SURBL is trained. Excellent. > You don't indicate whether you can/do use Bayes, SURBL, or the various > network tests. They help greatly (and SURBL is the best defense > against those "only have a graphic and link" spam emails. Each new > domain may sneak one or two through until SURBL gets updated, but then > they're dead. Yes, BAYES is running and is updated through sa-learn running against my various mailboxes every night. When 3.0.0 came out, Mandrake did not support it yet, and I missed the SURBL discussion. I checked out the website, but I am still clueless about it. Could you point me to something that will clue me in? And similarly about network tests. I assume that you mean comparing messages against public databases on the net. I thought that TOP_200, and TRIPWIRE did that for me? If not, what should I be using? Rob -- Mountlake Terrace, WA USA
