From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > since the upgrade from spamassassin 2.61 to 3.01. i sometimes experience
> > a strange problem. the subject of some mails is not rewritten with
> > *****SPAM**** even if the score is high enough and the report attached
> > to the headers says its spam:
> >
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin on ianus
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.0 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,MISSING_HEADERS,
> > MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_XBL,
> > SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no
>
> This is a FAQ question, or at least should be.
>
> MISSING_SUBJECT - the original mail doesn't have a subject.
>
> SA *RE*writes headers.  It doesn't *create* headers that weren't there.
> So since there was no subject, there was no subject to rewrite, so there
was
> no place to put the tag.
>
> There is an enhancement open on this, and I had thought that it actually
> made it in to 3.1.0 or so; but I could well be mistaken about that.
>
>         Loren

In the mean time a procmail/formail rule should be able to toss in a
dummy subject. I'll see if I can think of what the procmail search
string should look like. (I suspect a subject of all blanks, say 20 to
40 of them, would still trigger that behavior.)

{^_^}


Reply via email to