Re: 2.64 - SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID - incorrect interpretation of underscores??

[Matt Kettler]

At 08:30 PM 12/10/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
>The rule doesn't do very well anyway:
>
>   1.039   1.1433   0.1190    0.906   0.73    0.90  SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID
>
>Hence the <1 score it receives.
Perhaps this is a decent chunk of why the rule doesn't perform well.... It 
might be worth looking into modifying that regex in the eval to try to get 
better performance, or splitting them up so you can test each separately...
Nevermind. Looking at my most recent 300 spams, only one matched, and that 
didn't have a UNIQ_ID..

        Subject: {SPAM} 0rder your meds" today`
It doesn't look like spammers use UNIQ ID's in the subject lines often 
anymore..

The only one I did find, doesn't match the rule:
        Subject: {SPAM} STOP_PAYING_FOR YOUR Cable_Movies e6pgu33335
There are others posing as shipment notices, but the rule tries to skip 
them on purpose..

        Subject: {SPAM} Fedex Ship Notification, Tracking Number : 
VBN24530946 - 40352TZLP
        Subject: {SPAM} Fedex Delivery Confirmation, Tracking Number : 
ITZ65070066405343DJCK