Why not make the change to /usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf instead?
 That way when the next version comes out, presumably with the patch,
you don't have to remember to un-do the workaround?

-Michael

>>> Thomas Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/7/2004 1:14:42
AM >>>
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 22:52 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Received: from CM02.outbound.mail (mailer4.monteraymedia.com
[66.63.189.28]
>       (may be forged)) by mail.camerontech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with
ESMTP id
>       iB75ihQg015990 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Dec
2004
>       23:44:44 -0600
> Received: by CM02.outbound.mail (PowerMTA(TM) v2.0r6) id
h4mn9a050u48; Mon,
>       11 Jun 2001 22:47:13 -0700 (envelope-from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> 
> Remember "all trusted" really means "no untrusted links in the
recieved headers that we were able to parse".
> 
> If SA can't parse a received header line, it simply tosses it and
continues with the next one.  This may not be the best plan, and there
are various bugs open about the exact meaning and handling of
all-trusted.
> 
> The second header shown above doesn't have any ip addresses in it, so
it would get tossed (or maybe considered as local, I'm not positive).
> 
> That leaves the first header, which at a glance would seem to not
come from your network, so shouldn't be trusted.  I'm guessing that
there is something about the format of this header that SA doesn't much
care for, so it ended up tossing it as unreadable.
> 
> That would leave you with no received headers, which would mean that
the mail had been sent locally, so was obviously trusted.  :-(
> 
> There was a patch in the works a month or so back to somehow take
account of unparsable headers in determining all-trusted.  I was out of
town for most of November and lost track of the status of that change. 
Assuming that the problem here is the first received header was
unparsable, that patch may help matters if it is approved.
> 
>         Loren

Then I guess my next option is to set 

score ALL_TRUSTED 0 0 0 0

in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf until this gets resolved?

Thomas


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any 
attached or enclosed files may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential, proprietary and/or 
otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable 
law ("Confidential Information").  Any review, 
retransmission, publication, dissemination, 
distribution, forwarding, printing, copying, storing, saving 
or other use or disclosure of this communication and/or the 
Confidential Information, or taking any action in reliance 
thereon, by an individual or entity other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.  

This communication and the Confidential Information are 
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) and/or 
entity(ies) to which this communication is addressed. 
If you are not the intended recipient(s) (or responsible 
for delivery to said recipient(s)), please be advised 
that you have received this communication in error and 
have an obligation to promptly inform the sender by reply 
e-mail or facsimile and to permanently delete, shred or 
otherwise destroy, in its entirety, this original communication 
and all copies thereof, whether in electronic or hard copy format. 


Reply via email to