Theo Van Dinter wrote: > This has come up before: they're body rules now.
Maybe we should parse either in the URIBL module until 3.1? Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
- URIBL_JP_SURBL not working with 3.0.1 - but works with 3.0... Jason Haar
- Re: URIBL_JP_SURBL not working with 3.0.1 - but works... Theo Van Dinter
- Re: URIBL_JP_SURBL not working with 3.0.1 - but w... Jason Haar
- Re: URIBL_JP_SURBL not working with 3.0.1 - b... Daniel Quinlan
- Re: URIBL_JP_SURBL not working with 3.0.1... Theo Van Dinter
