>-----Original Message----- >From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:39 AM >To: Smart,Dan >Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis > > >Dan > >I find the surbl.org URIRBL list provides very good protection against >this kind of message, along with othe rules in www.rulesemporium.com I >don't recall seeing one slip through for ages.. >
Forget that I'm partial to these both, but Martin is right. SURBL stops them. I haven't seen one reported by my users in a very long time. I have analysed many pron images. I will conintue to do so over the coming years. My hope is to find some sort of pattern. Maybe I can get a Gov't grant to help me dig deeper into pron images full time. Yeah that would be cool. Long hours, but I feel it would help everyone. :-) --Chris (I read them for the bayes poison....honest!)
