I think Earthlink uses Brightmail. If that is so then Brightmail
statistics are VERY bad. I doubt I had any false alarms - lost email.
But it only got about 75% or less of the spam. I used it while on the
road the last two weeks. I might comment that I was very unimpressed.
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gray, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brightmail seems to be getting a lot of good press on the SPAM front.
So I'm wondering, why do people running large mail systems choose SA
over corporate offerings. Is it cost? Is it configurability, or
performance?
Can anyone shed any light on how Brightmail achieves the rather
impressive statistics it is quoting, or do you think it is just smoke
and mirrors?
Is it possible to reproduce the other features without spending the
cash?
