----- Original Message ----- 
From: "marti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> |I have a question here.  Doesn't that require clamav to load
> |the virus signatures each time?  If so, it would be pretty
> |inefficient  and resource-hungry.  Wouldn't the combination of
> |courier-maildrop/clamassassin and clamdscan be a lot faster
> |since the clamd daemon keeps the virus.db loaded?
> |--
>
> If the virus.db is always loaded, and assuming long uptimes, which *nix is
> good at, your virus definitions could be well out of date before they are
> next loaded, seems logical to load them on the fly to me.

Running ClamAV as a daemon (clamd) is much more efficient than running
non-daemonized (clamscan), and clamd can be configured to check it virus
definitions for updates periodically:

# Perform internal sanity check (database integrity and freshness).
# Default: 1800 (30 min)
SelfCheck 1800

Bill

Reply via email to