Hello Simon, Monday, November 1, 2004, 6:04:53 PM, you wrote:
SB> One of the things mentioned in the article is that Spam ... SB> is *ALSO* sent deliberately to addresses where it will SB> bounce, with the actual intended recipient as the Return address SB> ...\ SB> This is a technique I've been aware of for a long time now, and have SB> brought the issue up in the past a couple of times, but are there any SB> plan to combat this in future versions of SpamAssassin ? I've been quite happy with http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/bogus-virus-warnings.cf from Tim Jackson. His scoring has been a bit more aggressive than I like, but his rules work well for rejecting spam and virus bounces. Bob Menschel
