Hmm, I thought it may be a MailScanner/SA/SpamCopURI compatibility issue of some kind. But then Mike Zanker gave 0.09 a try with MailScanner and had no problems.
I'm not sure if Daniel Kleinsinger of MailScanner is on this list, so I'll cc him for a heads up. Daniel, can you give SpamCopURI 0.09 a try and see if you can duplicate this error? http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/ Jeff C. __ On Thursday, April 8, 2004, 11:41:18 PM, Damian Mendoza wrote: > I also have the exact same errors - using mailscanner as well with SA > 2.63. > Damian > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Stetser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 10:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jeff Chan > Subject: Re: SURBL support in SA 2.63 problems? > Running SA version 2.63 > Mail-SpamAssassin-SpamCopURI-0.09 did a make/test/install with no > errors but then when I try and use spamcop_uri.cf in my > /etc/mail/spamassassin dir and lint it I get: > Failed to compile URI SpamAssassin tests, skipping: > (syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/spamcop_uri.cf, rule > SPAMCOP_URI_RBL, line 1, near "eval:" > syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf, rule BigEvilList_135, > line 1823, near "; }" > ) > I move bigevil out of the SA dir for another lint, and midevil throws > syntax errs now. > I move all aux cf's out of .../spamassassin cept for local.cf and now > /usr/share/spamassassin/20_uri_tests.cf tosses lint errors. > Is there something that needs doing on 2.63 besides the SpamCopURI > install and copying the cf /rules over. > I use MailScanner, so don't deal with spamd/c, don't know if that makes > a difference... > Thanks, > Dan > At 02:48 PM 4/8/2004, Jeff wrote: >>Hi Steve, >>Eric Kolve has just issued a fix for the test suite in his 0.09 version >>of SpamCopURI: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/ >> >>Please give it a try and let us know what kind of results you get. :D -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
