SpamAssassin 3.0.1 running under IMail 8.13 (Windoze) is doing really great!
I've got about a 1% false negative rate, and way way less fp. Cool!

I know it's critical to sa-(re)learn any FP. I usually sa-learn the false
negatives, but sometimes I get lazy. Is that OK?

What I mean is, "Is autolearn OK for most use except FPs?" or do I need to
train it some more with hams and spams?

Magic sez:

0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version
0.000          0       9016          0  non-token data: nspam
0.000          0       3139          0  non-token data: nham
0.000          0     173601          0  non-token data: ntokens
0.000          0 1098935201          0  non-token data: oldest atime
0.000          0 1099134563          0  non-token data: newest atime
0.000          0 1099130472          0  non-token data: last journal sync
atime
0.000          0 1099108062          0  non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000          0     172800          0  non-token data: last expire atime
delta
0.000          0      30072          0  non-token data: last expire
reduction count

Reply via email to