On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, "Tuc at Beach House" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > The reason I joined was that I recently upgraded my FreeBSD box from 2.64
> > > to 3.0.1_1 (Not sure what about it makes it _1, but thats ok)
> > >
> > >   As soon as I did, the amount of spam I started getting as
> > > good deliveries SKYROCKETED. I thought maybe it was just me, but it
> > > appears at least *1* other person has seen this.


> > If you're logged in as the same user SpamAssassin's running as,
> > what does "sa-learn --dump magic" tell you?


On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Tuc at Beach House wrote:
>       The one I notice getting the worst spam (Since its my personal
> primary email address):
>
> himinbjorg% sa-learn --dump magic
> 0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000          0        175          0  non-token data: nspam
> 0.000          0      73501          0  non-token data: nham
> 0.000          0    1027341          0  non-token data: ntokens

I think 175 spam messages is not nearly enough for Bayes to be
adequately trained.  Also, the ratio of ham to spam (~0.3%) looks a
bit odd.  If it reflects roughly equal time periods over which you
received the messages, it suggests you might be missing (or perhaps
misclassifying) some of your spam.

-- 
Theodore (Ted) Heise     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     Bloomington, IN, USA

Reply via email to