----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Troy Bull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Problems With 3.01 detecting spam
1) your trusted_networks needs to be manually set..ALL_TRUSTED should only fire for mail that has never been outside your trusted network (ie: the network you admin). This also impacts the efficacy of certain other rules line dialup DNSBLs.
I set this to being local to my machine only.
2) it's odd (to me) that you need to jack up the bayes scores.. especially for the lower ranges.
Are you using network tests?
Yes (I think so)
Are you using surbl with them?
Again, yes I think so , how can i tell for sure?
The reason I ask is surbl is quite efficient, and it's diluted the scores of other rules a slight bit.
I'd also consider trying to train your bayes more aggressively.. If you've got spam matching BAYES_20 on any kind of regular basis, that's a problem.
I dont have that happening, most of the time with Bayes when it is a spam it gets 80 % or above.
