From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 03:39 PM 10/20/2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >Matt forgot about mimedefang. Which I only hear great things about.
> >Otherwise I would go with the milter.
>
> Technically speaking, mimedefang is a milter. But you are correct..
> Mimedefang is a pretty cool tool.
>
> Personally I like MailScanner, but that's just based on my liking of the
> ability to manage the number of inbound MTAs separately from the number of
> SA scanning processes. High-rate bursts mostly impact my queue depth, not
> my memory usage.
>
> All the integration tools have their strengths and weaknesses. Pick the
one
> that does what you need.
>
> (One of MailScanner's weaknesses is lack of ability to do a SMTP layer
> reject based on SA. Something MimeDefang is capable of.)
Which is not a problem for those of us using fetchmail.
{^_-}
