And Chris, if they do spam, we need to crucify them this time. Not just the domain, let's do a lookup of every domain the company owns and add them as well...
Matthew, It's not a morality thing! It's just we're tired of being spammed by shady people. > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:08 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [ot] If you see this domain in spam.... > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:52 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: [ot] If you see this domain in spam.... > > > > > >Chris Santerre wrote: > >> Which is exactly why I'm asking for a spam that contains this. How > >> was that missed in my message? > > > >You don't like the domain and now you're soliciting spam that > >contains it just so you can block it. That constitutes partiality. > > > > Partiality towards spam? I won't list it unless it is spam. I guess you > are > not on the whitelist group, so you have missed the entire discussion we > have > had with this domain. We have been in close contact with the owner. We > have > actually already removed them. > > So you might not have all the facts to judge me on some sort of witch > hunt. > I'm sorry if my initial email looks that way. > > I'm asking for people to keep an eye out for this one. What, now I can't > mention any particular domain that I'm interested in listing? WTH kind of > logic is that? If you think this is so cut and dry then go ahead and make > your own SURBL server. You will soon find yourself adrift in a sea of grey > like the rest of us. > > It simple, they got on the list. They begged, kicked, moaned, and talked > their way off. They still look somewhat spammy. I'm asking for people to > watch for them. If they don't spam, they have nothing to worry about. > > End of story. > > > --Chris