And Chris, if they do spam, we need to crucify them this time.  Not just
the domain, let's do a lookup of every domain the company owns and add
them as well...  

Matthew, 

It's not a morality thing!  It's just we're tired of being spammed by
shady people.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:08 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [ot] If you see this domain in spam....
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:52 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [ot] If you see this domain in spam....
> >
> >
> >Chris Santerre wrote:
> >> Which is exactly why I'm asking for a spam that contains this. How
> >> was that missed in my message?
> >
> >You don't like the domain and now you're soliciting spam that
> >contains it just so you can block it.  That constitutes partiality.
> >
> 
> Partiality towards spam? I won't list it unless it is spam. I guess
you
> are
> not on the whitelist group, so you have missed the entire discussion
we
> have
> had with this domain. We have been in close contact with the owner. We
> have
> actually already removed them.
> 
> So you might not have all the facts to judge me on some sort of witch
> hunt.
> I'm sorry if my initial email looks that way.
> 
> I'm asking for people to keep an eye out for this one. What, now I
can't
> mention any particular domain that I'm interested in listing? WTH kind
of
> logic is that? If you think this is so cut and dry then go ahead and
make
> your own SURBL server. You will soon find yourself adrift in a sea of
grey
> like the rest of us.
> 
> It simple, they got on the list. They begged, kicked, moaned, and
talked
> their way off. They still look somewhat spammy. I'm asking for people
to
> watch for them. If they don't spam, they have nothing to worry about.
> 
> End of story.
> 
> 
> --Chris

Reply via email to