-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Rumpf writes: > I've seen a few messages recently that contained the header > > X-message-flag: Authentic Sender, Hash: PoHgCaAr > > My questions are, are they trying to simulate something like hash cash? Does > anyone know of a MUA that inserts/utilizes this header? I suspect it's targeted at a specific receiving site -- I have no idea which one though. (that's what X-Message-Info is apparently intended to do.) If that's the case it makes a killer spam-sign for people on any other ISP ;) Has anyone seen these headers? Perhaps AOL? - --j. > I would like to insert a local rule to score on this similar to the > X_MESSAGE_INFO rule in 20_ratware.cf, but wanted to ask of others' opinion > first: > > header X_MESSAGE_INFO exists:X-Message-Info > describe X_MESSAGE_INFO Bulk email fingerprint (X-Message-Info) found > > --------------- examples ------------------- > > Subject: ***SPAM*** Call me > Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 03:11:44 -0500 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/related; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00NX_00B9614KA_04C.008C38K0" > X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 > X-message-flag: Authentic Sender, Hash: TrVfLjGp > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: ***SPAM*** Your test results > Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:58:41 -0500 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/related; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00KS_01G0282KJ_04E.864L81I0" > X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 > X-message-flag: Authentic Sender, Hash: PoHgCaAr > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFBargWMJF5cimLx9ARAvJsAJ4/XPgeBjE7duy/LZAEFHMGUopGsACfTDwQ lYyIC8SVXSVI7Hl9PCSZWn4= =W+Y9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
