On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:02:50 AM, David Thurman wrote: > On 9/29/04 8:55 AM, "Christiaan den Besten" wrote:
>>> Why are we not supposed to just add it to >>> /usr/share/spamassassin/25_uribl.cf? As apposed to local.cf? >> >> Because this file will be overwritten on the next update of SA. > Ah so I see said the blind man. Understood, so this is something that is > optional as far as SA is concerned. > Thanks For now, yes. However a rule for JP has already been added to the SA 3.1 branch, or so I heard. :-) I suppose that means you'll want to take out the one in local.cf after upgrading to 3.1. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
