-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:12 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Memory usage question

-----Original Message-----
From: Brook Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:04 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Memory usage question

On Friday 17 September 2004 07:05, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Yeah, bring that 50 down a little :) Maybe 10. More memory NEVER hurt
> anyone!
>
> Currently with BigEvil I'm running 51 megs for spamd!!! But the record
on a
> production server is something like 145. I think it was a crazy german
;)
>
> Your memory usage looks pretty normal.
>
> I haven't updated BE in a while. Plan on doing this afternoon. For the
> remaining people using BE, "WTH is wrong with you?" :-)

Chris I know it's not needed but with 3.0rc4 running big evil and a few
other 
custom rules spamd is at 53 megs and I have 5 children processes that
are 
each eating about 56 megs apiece. I wondered if it was true but each
child 
shows slightly different memory usage so they are reading separately. My

system has 1 gig of ram and almost 4 gigs of swap. It doesn't use the
swap 
much though.  

I run my system just for me right now so no other users and it filterers
out 
about 1000 spams a day out of a total of 2000 emails a day or so at
peak. 

I'm also running the surbl lists on this server. I upgraded from an
older 
spamassassin install and just haven't gotten around to cleaning out the
old 
files yet. Hey though since I went to spamassassin 3.0 I have only had
about 
2 or 3 emails get through in the last 2 or 3 months. With 1000 spam
emails a 
day that's not bad.

-- 
 
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~
`'~-
                                      Brook Humphrey           
        Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107        
http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
                                 Holiness unto the Lord
 
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~
`'~-

Were do you change the count again? I keep forgetting. (I mean what file
do I edit to lower m50, Im going to try m10 until we upgrade our memory)


Nevermind, I found it

Reply via email to