Hi This is a header of a mail sent via Lotus Notes and I noticed no false positives from Lotus Notes I running Spamassassin 2.63 with some ruleset from SARE and Amavisd-new / Max
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.12 February 13, 2003 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:44:08 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on XXX02/XXXXX/XX(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 2004-09-10 13:44:10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by Cleanmail at kringdata.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 tagged_above=-50.0 required=6.5 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KD_MVH, NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 13:02, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Would you care to share an example with SA headers?
Sadly not possible as these emails are getting rejected, we reject anything with a spam score over 10. So no I don't have the headers, but they are all happening to the same organisation and they are all lotus notes users.
Ron
Ron McKeating wrote:
Has anybody noticed a high proportion of false positives from clients using lotus notes ?
Ron
