On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 2:26:37 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:17 PM >>To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn >>Cc: Alex Broens; >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; SURBL >>Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >>Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block? >> >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >> >>Raymond Dijkxhoorn writes: >>> Hi! >>> >>> > Chris, Raymond , >>> > >>> > I went thru a random few of these and they're were listed >>at Spamhaus. >>> > Using spamhaus at SMTP level or SA doing RBL lookups would >>have caught and >>> > stopped them... Spamcop probably has quite a few of them >>listed as well >>> >>> No, that wont work. The spams are sended in via >>trojans/proxys only the >>> websites are static. SOME are blocked with DSBL and so but >>most of the >>> time they start a spamrun with a fresh set it seems. >>> >>> So yes, they are inside spamhaus, but only the websites, >>didnt see mails >>> sended out from there (yet). >> >>Are their NS records listed in the SBL? >> >>- --j. > No, but extremely easy to add. However....I'm not sure Jeff would like that. > Would have to be a seperate list. > -_Chris ADD THEM TO SBL. DO NOT ADD THEM TO SURBL. Holy fsck guys! We have a good thing going here. We're put a lot of work into it so far, and it's working pretty well. Let's not tear apart the SURBL project, OK? Give me a chance to make some improvements in the next version of the data engine. It will take into account resolved IPs and get new domains onto the lists sooner. Jeff C.
