I quarantine mail scoring between 6.0 and 12.0 (it's 99% spam) using 
MailScanner's quarantine system.  It's delivered to a spambox that I check 
hourly during the day.  We get only a couple of true FP's per week, and the 
last two were from two different AOL addresses.

For a quick fix, I took AOL off the list of "webmail" providers list in the 
FROM_WEBMAIL_END_NUMS6 test.  I'll admit that it's a bit unusual to use SIX 
digits to make your name unique; addresses with than many digits are likely to 
be bogus.

Pierre


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 8:43 AM
To: Pierre Thomson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unreasonable penalty for AOL addresses ending in numbers?


Pierre

depends on how you handle a score of 6.651 in MailScanner....

I deliver (with Tagged subject) scores from 5-10, and block anything 
with score > 10, so this kind of thing still ends up in the recipients 
email.

You could lower the score of the rules in spam.assassin.prefs.conf, or 
whitelist known users in the same file..


--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


Pierre Thomson wrote:
> I have had a couple of FP's recently from valid AOL users.  AOL recommends 
> appending digits to your screen name to make it unique, and many users do 
> that.  The result (sender using AOL 9.0 client, SA 2.63) is a penalty of 6.39 
> points right off the bat.  Isn't that a bit extreme?
> 
> Pierre Thomson
> BIC
> 
> 
> Received: from imo-m15.mx.aol.com (imo-m15.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.205])
>       by mail1.domain.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i882gcu10544
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:38 -0400
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       by imo-m15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.4.) id 4.13c.83038c (3972)
>        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:29 EDT
> Subject: Re: Equipment
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
> boundary="-----------------------------1094611349"
> X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112
> X-Local-MailScanner-Information: See www.mailscanner.info for information
> X-Local-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-Local-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=6.651, required 6,
>       ADDR_NUMS_AT_BIGSITE 2.70, BAYES_40 -0.00, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.99,
>       FROM_WEBMAIL_END_NUMS6 2.70, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16)
> X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2004 02:42:45.0517 (UTC) 
> FILETIME=[8554E3D0:01C4954D]

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************

Reply via email to