On Sunday, September 5, 2004, 3:30:49 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: > Seeing those data it would be very interesting if we could test a seperate > list. Is that possible? I would like to test the Prolo and Joe's list > combined, without the rest of the WS list. I can generate the data for a > test like that. I have seen allmost zero FP's in the data i compose, so > perhaps its better to seperate the lists. I think people would benefit > from a less FP stuffed list. The current WS list is just compiled out of > too many datasources i think.
If you can make the different lists available to me by rsync, I can easily set up some temporary local SURBLs for testing them. Thank you rbldnsd! :-) Unfortunately I don't have my own test corpora, so I need to rely on the generosity of others who do. So I'd probably need to ask Theo, Daniel, Justin or others with corpora to test against them. Jeff C.
