On Wed, 01 Sep 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled: > So I'm wondering - any ideas on dealing with giant-attachment spam?
How many of SA's rules run over non-textual attachments? (rawbody rules, I guess... there are only 41 of those. Not many.) It might be worthwhile arranging to have two limits, one at the current 256Kb for the combined size of all textual parts alone, and one rather higher for total message size. (Of course, spamc would not be able to enforce both those limits, as it doesn't even know what a MIME part is: spamd / spamassassin itself would have to take over this chore.) -- `The copyright file is for everyone. That we make it available in plain-text, uncompressed form rather than in spinning, throbbing OpenGL-rendered 3D text over a thumping dance music soundtrack is a feature, not a bug.' --- Branden Robinson
