If your "spread" is good and it's just the threshold that needs adjusting, it 
would be trivial to make a rule that fires on every message and give it a score 
equal to the desired difference...

Pierre Thomson
BIC


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Flowers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 10:01 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: shifting the midpoint between the average spam and average
ham


 > why do you need to alter the average scores of ham/spam?

What a horrible horrible mess if we can't!

One example:
All of my users have set their "optimal" spam thresholds to some number 
between 0.0 and 10.0.
If the SA developers correctly shift around test scores, add new and/or 
improved algorithms, etc., and I need to take advantage of the latest, 
greatest technology and upgrade to the latest version of SA, then 
without such a mechanism, all of my users' spam threshold settings (that 
they had previously spent a lot of hopeful time setting) will be totally 
off  the mark and are all of a sudden likely to miss all kinds of 
legitimate email messages! i.e., kill me!

To this logical end, SA should be constantly/automatically shifting this 
midpoint back to 5.0 anyway.

Joe

Reply via email to