It should (unless there's a bug). It should be not that hard to verify (or ultimately debug + adding a related test).
Let us know! -------------------------- Alessandro Benedetti Visiting card - https://sease.io/about/alessandro-benedetti <http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti> Blog - https://sease.io/blog <http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk> "Tyger, tyger burning bright In the forests of the night, What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England On Wed, 21 May 2025, 19:57 Natarajan, Rajeswari, <rajeswari.natara...@sap.com.invalid> wrote: > The documentation says as below > > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/dense-vector-search.html#graph-pre-filtering > > The example request below shows two usages of vector query parsers that > will get no implicit Pre-Filtering from any of the fq parameters, because > neither usage is as the main q param: > ?q=(color_str:red OR {!vectorSimilarity f=color_vector minReturn=0.7 > v="[1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0]"}) > &fq={!knn f=title_vector topK=10}[9.0, 8.0, 7.0, 6.0] > &fq=inStock:true > > > In the hybrid query ,Boolean query is performed , so the vector part of > the query does not honor the fq ? . Please confirm > > Thanks, > Rajeswari > > From: "Natarajan, Rajeswari" <rajeswari.natara...@sap.com> > Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 11:48 AM > To: "users@solr.apache.org" <users@solr.apache.org> > Subject: Implicit filters on hybrid query > > Hi, > > Following this page to do hybrid search > https://sease.io/2023/12/hybrid-search-with-apache-solr.html > > In hybrid search , will the fq params be honored by vector search as a pre > filter. > > Let me know. > > > Thanks, > Rajeswari > >
