Hi Sjoerd. I've checked the guide https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/indexing-guide/filters.html#common-grams-filter it suggests the different filters for indexing and query analyser. You didn't mention using them both differently.
Note, index and query time analysis maybe checked via solr Admin analysis page. And parsed query is shown via debugQuery=true. Hope it helps to troubleshoot. I've found a test proving some usage of commongrams, but there are no slopes over there. https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/8479d6da5e514fcd42720c42d14ebfb08ceed3f2/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/analysis/CommonGramsPhraseQueryTest.java#L30 On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 6:02 PM Sjoerd Smeets <ssme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We are using a CommonGrams filter for both indexing and querying. We > provide a list of words that should be treated as a common gram. In the > list the following words exist: > > - new > - york > > When we do queries like: > > "new amsterdam"~3 > "old york"~3 > "new york"~3 > > all give not the expected results. After further investigation, it seems > like that the CommonGramsQuery filter should not be applied for proximity > searches where you want to have this applied for normal searches. > > When we remove the CommonGramsQuery filter out of the config and run the > queries again, it works as expected. > > Any suggestions on how to overcome this? > > Thanks, > Sjoerd > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
