Cool! I missed that!
I'll make sure to align with my digital marketing manager to make her add
all our Solr-related external posts!
Good to see this live!
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*

e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io


*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source

Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>


On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 20:13, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:

> There *is* a Solr blog site that just launched:
>  https://solr.apache.org/blog.html
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 3:49 PM rajani m <rajinima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > @Alessandro,
> > Is there a solr blog site where we can submit work/articles or are you
> > suggesting to post on my own site and share a link here? I prefer the
> > former if there is one because there were times when I had my own,
> > it hardly had any views and on top of that google blogging made me
> migrate
> > from blogs to sites and sites got deprecated. Is there or can we have a
> > solr specific wiki/blog site  where solr users can submit common features
> > configs/modules configs/examples/performance metrics and so on....and
> maybe
> > have a voting/likes to confirm it works. We will have one common place to
> > submit and look for.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 3:33 PM rajani m <rajinima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Run the same knn queries at a slow throughput  for 30-60 minutes, this
> > > should warm up disk caches with hnsw index files, and then you should
> see a
> > > significant drop in the query time. Also make use of "fq" and reduce
> the
> > > document space as much as you can.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:50 PM Iram Tariq
> > > <iram.ta...@northbaysolutions.net.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi  Alessandro,
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for the feedback. Kindly see my comments below,
> > >>
> > >> *Ale*:
> > >>
> https://www.elastic.co/blog/accelerating-vector-search-simd-instructions,
> > >> I
> > >> suggest to experiment with simD vector improvements  (unless you are
> > >> already doing it)
> > >>
> > >> * We will try this soon. *
> > >>
> > >> *Ale*: What about the machine memory?
> > >>
> > >> Following is the system specification:  Linux ( CPU:64, RAM:488 GB,
> > >> OS:Ubuntu 20.04.6 )
> > >>
> > >> *Ale*: you can fine-tune the hyper-parameter to compromise a bit on
> recall
> > >> in favour of performance  (hnswBeamWidth, hnswMaxConnections)
> > >>
> > >> I am trying this as a first step. But I am sure it will impact recall.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Iram Tariq | Software Architect
> > >>
> > >> NorthBay
> > >>
> > >> Direct:  +1 (902) 329-7329
> > >>
> > >> iram.ta...@northbaysolutions.net
> > >>
> > >> www.northbaysolutions.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 5:42 AM Alessandro Benedetti <
> > >> a.benede...@sease.io>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > That's interesting.
> > >> > I think it's vital to get back some performance tests from the
> > >> community.
> > >> > Since my contribution to support Vector-search in Apache Solr was
> > >> merged,
> > >> > we got little or null feedback to understand its performance, in
> > >> real-world
> > >> > use cases.
> > >> > Blogs, open benchmarks or even just this sort of mail message are
> > >> welcome.
> > >> > Let me reply in line:
> > >> > --------------------------
> > >> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > >> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > >> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > >> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > >> >
> > >> > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > >> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > >> >
> > >> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > >> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > >> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > >> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > >> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 21:06, Kent Fitch <kent.fi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi Iram,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Is the machine doing lots of IO? If the hnsw graphs are not
> entirely
> > >> in
> > >> > > memory, performance will be poor. What JVM? You may get some
> benefit
> > >> from
> > >> > > simd support in java 21. Can you use the latest quantisation
> changes
> > >> in
> > >> > > Lucene to reduce memory footprint of the hnsw graphs? That's a
> large
> > >> > topk,
> > >> > > but I guess you need it?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best regards
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Kent Fitch
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2024, 5:12 am Iram Tariq,
> > >> > > <iram.ta...@northbaysolutions.net.invalid> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi All,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I am using Dense vectors in SOLR and facing slowness in it. Each
> > >> search
> > >> > > is
> > >> > > > taking 10-25 seconds. I want to reduce the time to 5 seconds (or
> > >> less
> > >> > > > ideally).
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Following configurations are being used.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >    1. *SOLR Version:* 9.3.0
> > >> > > >    2. *Lucene Version:* 9.7.0
> > >> > >
> > >> > *Ale*:
> > >> >
> > >>
> https://www.elastic.co/blog/accelerating-vector-search-simd-instructions,
> > >> > I
> > >> > suggest to experiment with simD vector improvements  (unless you are
> > >> > already doing it)
> > >> >
> > >> > > >    3. *Vector Dimensions*: 384
> > >> > > >    4. *Total Shards:* 5
> > >> > > >    5. *Number of Vectors (Per shard*): 43209158
> > >> > > >    6. *JVM for each Instance:* 35GB
> > >> > >
> > >> > *Ale*: What about the machine memory?
> > >> >
> > >> > > >    7. *TopK: *1000  (Getting 1000 from each shard)
> > >> > > >    8. *Rows: *1000
> > >> > > >    9. *Vector Field Schema:  *<fieldType name="knn_vector_384"
> > >> > > >    class="solr.DenseVectorField" hnswMaxConnections="20"
> > >> > > > knnAlgorithm="hnsw"
> > >> > > >    vectorDimension="384" similarityFunction="cosine"
> > >> > hnswBeamWidth="40"/>
> > >> > >
> > >> > *Ale*: you can fine-tune the hyper-parameter to compromise a bit on
> > >> recall
> > >> > in favour of performance  (hnswBeamWidth, hnswMaxConnections)
> > >> >
> > >> > > >    10. *Stored*: False
> > >> > > >    11. *WebServer:* Apache Tomcat
> > >> > > >    12. *System Specs*:  Linux ( CPU:64, RAM:488 GB, OS:Ubuntu
> > >> 20.04.6 )
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Any sort of help/clue will be appreciated.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Iram Tariq | Software Architect
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > NorthBay
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Direct:  +1 (902) 329-7329
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > iram.ta...@northbaysolutions.net
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > www.northbaysolutions.com
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
>

Reply via email to