Boy, do I remember this "I did a cool thing and nobody looked" feeling for
Solr RefGuide.

But if it could be useful for this project, my Guide import code is still
public. I actually read the content straight from ASCIIDoc internal
representation as opposed to Tika:
https://github.com/arafalov/solr-refguide-indexing/blob/master/src/com/solrstart/refguide/Indexer.java


Regards,
   Alex.
P.s.  JesterJ does look interesting, though not related to what I am doing
right now (so not digging deeper).



On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 21:12, Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> *TLDR;* I put up a github repo (check it out):
> https://github.com/nsoft/index-solr-ref-guide
>
> *The Details:*
> Last Year I announced JesterJ's 1.0 release and gave a lightning talk about
> it at Haystack. There were lots of folks who seemed to think it sounded
> cool, but I got zero useful feedback, and no evidence that even one person
> downloaded and ran it. This was very discouraging, and I wound up ignoring
> it for a while.
>
> I suspect the problem is that trying it out on a project at work is too
> high stakes, and the majority of folks attending conferences already have
> some sort of working solution. Also coming up with data to index that isn't
> entirely pointless can be a chore.
>
> Tonight I was thinking a thought I've had many times before: It's kind of
> silly that the Solr ref guide isn't indexed and searchable in a solr
> instance. Currently the ref guide uses a JS based library which has the
> downside of not being able to serve results for past versions.
>
> Then it hit me. This is a great, low stakes way for people to play with
> JesterJ and try it out without having to go search for data. So tonight I
> took 30 min and wrote an ingest to consume Solr Ref Guide (it was that
> easy! almost faster than building the html site) and and now I have a repo
> that anyone can check out, and fiddle with, that doesn't include the whole
> JesterJ project.
>
> It's intentionally just a starting point. Please give feedback or even
> PR's. I made a couple of issues noting the most obvious enhancements.
>
> I am aware that there have been attempts to do this in the past, and it's
> non-trivial to do it well, but  I hope this can be a fun community effort
> with no time pressure, and opportunities to learn lots of different things.
>
> Enjoy,
> Gus
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
>

Reply via email to