Hi,

You can read about building from source here 
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-docs/solr-source-code.adoc

TLDR: ./gradlew assemble

Jan

> 2. feb. 2024 kl. 11:00 skrev Suraksha Shetty <sshet...@opentext.com.INVALID>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your response. Can you please let me know what is the procedure to 
> create a private build.
> Can we migrate the jars using the Tomcat migration tool?
> 
> Thanks,
> Suraksha
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan....@cominvent.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 1:23 PM
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Solr9 support for Tomcat10
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
> content is safe. If you feel that the email is suspicious, please report it 
> using PhishAlarm.
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> Tricky noe. You may want to weigh in on 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16441__;!!Obbck6kTJA!bRDiQ5A1DSfxZPcxG8Hxmnlt1e3yskD5k4GBTrQ_QC9WOhnkXFBAOGuKDwYfYIww3JzqNAUu9tvMD-sQFpzl$
>   and perhaps help it move forward. Once Solr is on Jetty 11 or 12 this 
> should be possible. But don’t hold your breath until we start planning a Solr 
> 10 release, probably after Lucene releases v10.
> 
> But you can make a private build of Solr earlier of course.
> 
> Jan Høydahl
> 
>> 1. feb. 2024 kl. 07:05 skrev Suraksha Shetty <sshet...@opentext.com.invalid>:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> We are migrating Tomcat 9 to 10.1 in our product. As part of this migration 
>> namespace Javax is changed to Jakarta.
>> We are using Solr9 as an embedded web app.
>> We have a custom SolrDispatchFilter which extends the 
>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter which is still using javax. 
>> Because of this we are facing compilation errors since Jakarta cannot be 
>> converted to javax.
>> 
>> Please let us know if Solr9 is supported with Tomcat 10. If not, please let 
>> us know what can be done for the above issue.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Suraksha
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to