Thanks Shawn for running a test at your end. I checked the Solrconfig and I did not find any warm up queries patterns, to run at the time of startup, That section was disabled in the solrconfig.xml
I uploaded the solr startup file to google drive , please find the link below. https://drive.google.com/file/d/15bBV8WfIvm0hbJ4IApiTA4Huh16NOnA4/view?usp=sharing The *customers_fab* has the highest number of documents, around 2.2M. If you verify in the log, the cores were identified at 2023-10-26 *08:21:33.981 * but the customes_fab "registered new searcher" at "2023-10-26 *08:23:16.851*", the autowarm time shows as 0ms. the remaining cores are small, and they show up immediately when I query them. So I am wondering if the autowarm takes 0s which steps might be slowing down registering the new searcher. That is how I figured, if I change useColdSearcher to "true" , the core shows up right away for queries, even with the 2.2M documents. This is a sandbox, with 2CPU, 8GB ram , 4GB heap space, running Fedora. Please let me know your thoughts. thank you S On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:00 AM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid> wrote: > On 10/26/23 08:36, Surya R wrote: > > That was my assumption that some queries were taking longer time during > the > > warmup. That is why I turned off the warmup count and made it to zero, > but > > still the slow behavior. > > Can you restart Solr and provide the entire solr.log file? Maybe that > will have some information about why the searcher takes so long to open. > You can't attach files to your message, you need to put it on a file > sharing site and give us the URL. > > > One thing I was curious about was, if the cache was being warmed up with > > queries from the listener, why was I not seeing them in the solr.log, > could > > it be the verbosity level ? > > I defined a firstSearcher query of "body:misc" in my solrconfig.xml, and > I see the query in solr.log after restarting Solr: > > 2023-10-26 14:50:59.067 INFO > (searcherExecutor-20-thread-1-processing-solr.elyograg.org:443_solr > dovecot_2023_03_shard1_replica_t1 dovecot_2023_03 shard1 core_node2) > [dovecot_2023_03 shard1 core_node2 dovecot_2023_03_shard1_replica_t1] > o.a.s.c.S.Request webapp=null path=null > params={q=body:misc&distrib=false&event=firstSearcher} hits=1029 > status=0 QTime=185 > > If you turned down the logging level from the default of INFO, Solr's > logfile will be almost completely silent. When I was asking for the > solr.log above, I am assuming that it is still at INFO. If it's at WARN > or ERROR it will not have any useful info. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > -- -- Surya