This would in theory return the average of the vectors:

let(a=select(search(...), film_vector),
     b=col(a, film_vector),
     m=matrix(valueAt(b, 0), valueAt(b, 1), valueAt(b, 2)),
     av=scalarDivide(3, sumColumns(m))




Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/


On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 2:50 PM ufuk yılmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.invalid>
wrote:

> The main thing which converts search result fields to arrays is the “col”
> function
> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_4/vectorization.html#creating-a-vector-with-the-col-function
>
> You may also need “let” to use variables etc. Rest is  just employing
> available math functions.
>
> But they don’t play well with multivalued fields, it’s hard to work with
> them. They look like arrays but are not exactly arrays. It’s just a bunch
> of values sticking together. For example afaik there’s no way to refer to
> 1st, 2nd element of a multivalued field. When you enable docValues and use
> the export handler, those values would be returned in ascending order,
> losing position information.
>
> For example if the ratings were from different movie raters, such as imdb,
> rottentomatoes etc and every rating were in a different field, it would be
> much easier to work with, as Solr expects to build arrays and matrices from
> such formatted documents.
>
> I’d be happy to learn if someone more knowledgeable has a better answer.
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows
>
> From: Eric Pugh
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2023 8:05 PM
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Vector math with Streaming Expressions?
>
> By average them, I mean the first version.   So at the end, I get a set of
> numbers that represents the average vector.
>
> Here is an example of the vector..
> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/example/films/films.json#L8365
>
> In the existing docs on searching vectors, we make a statement that we
> have the average vector of three movies:
> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/example/films/README.md?plain=1#L154
>
> I’d actually like to figure out how to calculate that vector from data we
> have in Solr already.
>
>
>
> > On Oct 14, 2023, at 12:50 PM, ufuk yılmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > By “average them” do you mean to calculate the simple arithmetic average
> element by element of the all returned film ratings? Eg. sum first element
> of all arrays and divide by the number of arrays, do it again for the
> second element etc..
> >
> > Or find the average of the array for each movie, producing a single
> number for each movie
> >
> > ~ufuk
> >
> > —
> >
> >> On 14 Oct 2023, at 19:19, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com
> <mailto:ep...@opensourceconnections.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I’m trying to average three arrays of floats and not quite making the
> conceptual jump from “I defined a array of numbers” in the way that the
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/visual-guide/solr/solr-ref-guide/src/vector-math.adoc#element-by-element-vector-math
> example expects with “I made a query and get back a array of numbers”.
> >>
> >> I’m using the films example, so :  bin/solr start -c -e films
> >>
> >> Then, I want to get the vectors for three films and average them.
> >>
> >> The streaming expression grabs the three vectors, but I can’t figure
> out how to wrap it in something to average them.
> >>
> >> select(
> >> search(films,
> >>       qt="/select",
> >>       q="name:"Finding Nemo" OR name:"Bee Movie" OR name:"Harry Potter
> and the Chamber of Secrets"",
> >>       fl="id,name,film_vector"),
> >> film_vector
> >> )
> >>
> >> produces:
> >>
> >> {
> >> "result-set": {
> >>   "docs": [
> >>     {
> >>       "film_vector": [
> >>         "-0.2758314",
> >>         "-0.14416906",
> >>         "-0.11316811",
> >>         "0.2745105",
> >>         "0.040616427",
> >>         "-4.2628963E-4",
> >>         "-0.120363355",
> >>         "0.07888852",
> >>         "0.036417373",
> >>         "-0.29541242"
> >>       ]
> >>     },
> >>     {
> >>       "film_vector": [
> >>         "-0.11665395",
> >>         "0.04247921",
> >>         "-0.13233364",
> >>         "0.52578413",
> >>         "-0.1739291",
> >>         "-0.01880563",
> >>         "-0.06670809",
> >>         "-0.11242808",
> >>         "0.09724514",
> >>         "-0.11909142"
> >>       ]
> >>     },
> >>     {
> >>       "film_vector": [
> >>         "-0.14272659",
> >>         "0.13051921",
> >>         "-0.19087574",
> >>         "0.44983688",
> >>         "-0.21098459",
> >>         "0.0033124345",
> >>         "-0.008155139",
> >>         "-0.09109363",
> >>         "0.12401622",
> >>         "-0.12211737"
> >>       ]
> >>     },
> >>     {
> >>       "EOF": true,
> >>       "RESPONSE_TIME": 24
> >>     }
> >>   ]
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> Great, now how do I average across them and get the final vector that I
> expect, which should be similar to:
> >>
> >> [-0.1784, 0.0096, -0.1455, 0.4167, -0.1148, -0.0053, -0.0651, -0.0415,
> 0.0859, -0.1789]
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Eric
> >>
> >> _______________________
> >> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467
> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/><
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>
> >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to
> be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
> _______________________
> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>
>

Reply via email to