You can write a plugin in Solr to add leading zeros padding back to the
responses based on that field. Maybe you can have a custom response writer.

On Tue, 4 Jul, 2023, 2:44 pm Alessandro Benedetti, <a.benede...@sease.io>
wrote:

> Not sure why you cross-posted this, my answer stands the same:
>
> "As an integer 0045 or 000000000000045 or 45 is exactly the same value in
> the decimal positional format.
>
> I agree with Charlie, if you need it to be a string, then use a string.
> You can potentially just use the string as a stored value, a copy field if
> you like, and keep the original indexed as an integer to do math search
> operations on.
> "
>
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 08:42, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello Shubham.
> > Storing 45 takes _less than_ one byte, Storing "0045" about four. I think
> > Solr just made a reasonable choice.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 9:47 AM John Jackson <john382...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > >
> > > Recently I got a response but Whenever we are inserting this value in
> the
> > > Database value is *0045*. the value showing in the listing is also
> > *0045*.
> > > but whenever we try to insert the value in *0045* it saves *45* in
> Solr.
> > So
> > > how can we achieve *0045* in solr for same?
> > >
> > > But if we are using copyField it leads to a large indexing space issue.
> > So
> > > is there any other way to achieve the goal to save *0045* in Solr?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any solution to achieve this goal.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > >
> > > Shubham Panchal
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> >
>

Reply via email to