Again, set to less than 32, I liked 30 

> On Mar 9, 2023, at 1:04 AM, Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The max heap could be the max heap used by the process uptill now. And not
> the max value you have set. I would suggest you increase the load by at
> least 20 times to see the max heap to go to 32 gb.
> 
> 
> Deepak
> "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated
> - Mahatma Gandhi"
> 
> +91 73500 12833
> deic...@gmail.com
> 
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
> 
> "Plant a Tree, Go Green"
> 
> Make In India : http://www.makeinindia.com/home
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 8:21 AM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 3/8/2023 9:24 AM, HariBabu kuruva wrote:
>>> I have set the Heap memory as -Xms 1g -Xmx 40g in the Production
>>> environment.
>>> 
>>> But when i see the Heap memory in the Solr UI. I can see the Max Heap
>> below.
>>> 
>>> Max: 3.8Gb
>>> Used: 2.2Gb
>> 
>> The other answers you've gotten are good.  This is mostly just a little
>> more detail.
>> 
>> If you really do have the spaces before the 1g and 40g, then those
>> values are probably not being honored as Jan said.
>> 
>> If you don't have the spaces, then Java will start with the heap size at
>> 1GB, and only increase it if there is enough memory pressure.  One thing
>> that I don't know is whether Java will use the 32 bit pointers with the
>> Xmx at 40g.  It probably won't, so I expect that memory usage would be
>> more efficient if you set the max heap to 31g.
>> 
>> With a heap size at 32GB or larger, Java has to use 64 bit pointers, and
>> that will make it use quite a bit more memory because Solr creates a LOT
>> of objects.
>> 
>> As Dave said, if you use Xms and Xmx, then they should be set to the
>> same value.  And the value should be less than 32GB for efficiency.
>> 
>> If you use the SOLR_HEAP environment variable in the include script,
>> then both Xms and Xmx will be set to the provided value.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>> 

Reply via email to