> I wonder if I have to recreate the collection with the same number of 
> shards... ?

If the collection is not of the same shape as the backup, I receive an 
exception, which is kind of logical `Unable to restoring since number of shards 
in backup and specified collection does not match, numShardsOfBackup:3 
numShardsOfCollection:5`

> I want to determine if this is actually a bug before we release 9.0

It is at least a need to better documentation. Later, I think something could 
be done to ensure the parameters are better used, e.g. for now I have to say 
`location=s3:/` which is not great.

On 2022/02/05 17:02:46 Eric Charles wrote:
> ... and thx Houston and other participants to this thread.
> 
> I have just restored the backup, and it works fine. The only point is that I 
> had to create the collection before restoring (I had dropped it). I wonder if 
> I have to recreate the collection with the same number of shards... ?
> 
> On 2022/02/05 16:55:26 Eric Charles wrote:
> > I have faced similar questions to get it working. I have first opened an 
> > issue on the solr-operator 
> > https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/404 and then was able to 
> > replicate the issue on my laptop, so came to the conclusion the issue was 
> > at solr level, and not solr-operator.
> > 
> > Without Sergio reply, I would not have been able to make sense of the 
> > parameters and get is working. Thx!
> > 
> > On 2022/01/27 14:01:46 Sergio García Maroto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Correct. Using "location=backupfolder"  didn't work for me.
> > > 
> > > The only way I made it work is with location=s3:/
> > > Below my sample url which works well.
> > > http://servername:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=BACKUP&name=personbackup&collection=person&repository=s3&location=s3:/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 17:23, Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Thanks for all of the information everybody. I want to determine if 
> > > > this is
> > > > actually a bug before we release 9.0
> > > >
> > > > First, I want to clear up the usage of the "location" parameter:
> > > >
> > > >    - It is required, but you can provide "/" as an "empty" directory, 
> > > > much
> > > >    like "s3:/".
> > > >    - You don't have to include "s3:/" or "s3://". You can you "/dir",
> > > >    "dir", "s3:/dir" or "s3://dir". All of these options will eventually 
> > > > be
> > > >    converted to the "dir/" directory in your bucket.
> > > >    - The s3 repository does not allow for directory names starting with
> > > >    "/". In general this is to allow all of the above ^ examples to 
> > > > compute
> > > > to
> > > >    the same thing without users being confused how many '/'s they need
> > > > after
> > > >    "s3:". Now I see that this may have contributed to the confusion, 
> > > > but we
> > > >    can always improve the documentation in the ref-guide.
> > > >
> > > > Now with these points cleared up, you said that you were unable to use 
> > > > the
> > > > collections API calls with "location=backupfolder" did not work, even
> > > > though you had a directory in your bucket named "backupfolder". Just to 
> > > > be
> > > > clear, in S3 the folder did not have a "/" prefix correct? If so, this 
> > > > is
> > > > indeed a bug and something that we should fix. I'll do more thorough
> > > > testing once you confirm that the directory is following the 
> > > > expectation.
> > > >
> > > > - Houston
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 3:32 AM Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 1/22/2022 12:38 AM, Sergio García Maroto wrote:
> > > > > > The only difference I can see i am using  collection API trying to
> > > > backup
> > > > > > solr cloud collection.
> > > > >
> > > > > That could do it.  I have done very little with SolrCloud beyond
> > > > > occasionally firing up the cloud example.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Collections API backup is most likely a different code path than 
> > > > > the
> > > > > replication handler backup.  I wonder if the behavior you're seeing
> > > > > would be considered a bug.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Shawn
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to