Solr 6.6.3 and log4j 1.2.17 are not vulnerable. You do not need to change 
anything.

wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)

> On Dec 30, 2021, at 12:39 AM, Iqrar Aminullah <iqrar.aminul...@xtremax.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi, We are User of Solr 6.6.3 along with Sitecore. Currently my team decided 
> to remove the log4j 1.2.17 in Solr 6.6.3 to mitigate the recent vulnerability 
> issues. I created a Jira ticket, but David Smiley told me to send an email 
> instead.
> 
> We tried to remove the Log4j library and place a Slf4j-jdk library onto the 
> Solr Application. So far there has been no problems on Solr. To make sure 
> that there is no problem, we decided to send this mail for advice. There are 
> two questions we want to ask.
> 1. Will changing the library has an impact to the overall Solr performance?
> 2. Is there anything we can do to make sure the Solr is not vulnerable 
> anymore by changing this library?
> 3. I was told by David in his comment that JUL isn’t working good. Is there 
> any other logging library we can use aside from JUL for Solr 6.6.3? If there 
> is, do you have any instructions on how to use the other library?
> 
> Thank you for your Advice
> 
> Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
> 

Reply via email to