Oh, thanks for pointing that out, Cassandra. Really appreciate it. I had some confusion on the process around votes and lazy consensus (since this is perhaps the only SIP that reached a voting thread and I didn't have any precedence to go by). This vote has actually failed. I'll move the status back to DISCUSS and re-initiate another voting, if needed. Regards, Ishan
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:21 AM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don’t want to start a fight here but the SIP process [1] doesn’t say > anything about a vote passing by lazy consensus. It offers 2 options, lazy > consensus via no further discussed objections OR a vote that must have 3 > binding +1s: > > --- > 5. When feedback iteration trails off on the DISCUSS thread, move to > either adopt the proposal. To do this you can either: > > quote_type > > > > a. rely on lazy consensus - announce your intention to proceed with the > SIP as written unless there are any further objections, then wait 3 > business days for readers to object or request an explicit VOTE instead. > > > > b. Alternatively, you can jump right to calling a formal VOTE. Create a > VOTE thread that points readers to your proposal and ask for votes. The > criteria for acceptance is consensus (3 binding +1 votes and no binding > vetoes). Once a VOTE thread is created, add a link to the table below so > the outcome can be tracked clearly. > --- > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Solr+Improvement+Proposals#SolrImprovementProposals-Process > > Cassandra > On Nov 18, 2021, 10:17 AM -0600, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > This SIP passes (mainly by lazy consensus) and we can now proceed to the > implementation phase. > > Thanks to all who voted. > > > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:12 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Devs and Users, > > > > > > > > SIP-15 for first class support of node roles has been proposed. > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/SIP-15+Node+roles > > > > > > > > The link contains a PDF file containing the discussion thread (since > the Pony mail thread links broke). The discussion happened in > d...@solr.apache.org list. > > > > > > > > To bring up any points worth discussing, please use the > d...@solr.apache.org list (instead of using this thread) and find the > thread with subject "First class support for node roles" there. > > > > > > > > Please vote on the proposal. Vote closes in 72 hours from now. > > > > > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ishan / Noble / Hitesh >
