Hello,
In performance tests conducted on the same system, comparing its performance
with Solr 5.2.1 verses 8.7, was found a
degradation<https://www.spellchecker.net/degradation> in the query execution
time.
The system uses a custom query parser, which constructs quite a large query
object.
When removing the ‘score’ parameter from the ‘fl’ list, the times were back as
in Solr 5.
Trying to trouble shoot using jstack (small bash script that take a jstack of
the Solr thread every few milliseconds) found that the Solr 8 thread “spends”
time in the stack: (was appearing in several jstack snippets)
"qtp2038105753-19" #19 prio=5 os_prio=0 cpu=1837.18ms elapsed=10334.56s
tid=0x00007f7da0973000 nid=0x6ddd runnable [0x00007f7d6d5f2000]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
at
sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.pread0(java.base@13.0.2/Native<mailto:java.base@13.0.2/Native>
Method)
at
sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.pread(java.base@13.0.2/FileDispatcherImpl.java:54<mailto:java.base@13.0.2/FileDispatcherImpl.java:54>)
at
sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(java.base@13.0.2/IOUtil.java:274<mailto:java.base@13.0.2/IOUtil.java:274>)
at
sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(java.base@13.0.2/IOUtil.java:245<mailto:java.base@13.0.2/IOUtil.java:245>)
at
sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.readInternal(java.base@13.0.2/FileChannelImpl.java:811<mailto:java.base@13.0.2/FileChannelImpl.java:811>)
at
sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.read(java.base@13.0.2/FileChannelImpl.java:796<mailto:java.base@13.0.2/FileChannelImpl.java:796>)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.NIOFSDirectory$NIOFSIndexInput.readInternal(NIOFSDirectory.java:170)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.refill(BufferedIndexInput.java:315)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.readByte(BufferedIndexInput.java:254)
at
org.apache.lucene.util.fst.ReverseRandomAccessReader.readByte(ReverseRandomAccessReader.java:33)
at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.readLabel(FST.java:596)
at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.readArc(FST.java:1259)
at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.readNextRealArc(FST.java:1247)
at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.readFirstRealTargetArc(FST.java:1091)
at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.findTargetArc(FST.java:1396)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktree.SegmentTermsEnum.seekExact(SegmentTermsEnum.java:485)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.FilterLeafReader$FilterTermsEnum.seekExact(FilterLeafReader.java:184)
at org.apache.lucene.index.TermStates.loadTermsEnum(TermStates.java:124)
at org.apache.lucene.index.TermStates.build(TermStates.java:109)
at org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseQuery$1.getStats(PhraseQuery.java:447)
at org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseWeight.<init>(PhraseWeight.java:38)
at org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseQuery$1.<init>(PhraseQuery.java:429)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseQuery.createWeight(PhraseQuery.java:429)
at org.apache.lucene.search.BoostQuery.createWeight(BoostQuery.java:125)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:726)
at org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.<init>(BooleanWeight.java:63)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery.createWeight(BooleanQuery.java:231)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:726)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.TopFieldCollector.populateScores(TopFieldCollector.java:563)
at
org.apache.solr.search.Grouping$Command.populateScoresIfNecessary(Grouping.java:593)
at
org.apache.solr.search.Grouping$CommandFunc.finish(Grouping.java:1007)
at org.apache.solr.search.Grouping.execute(Grouping.java:408)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.doProcessGroupedSearch(QueryComponent.java:1486)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.process(QueryComponent.java:395)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:360)
This doesn’t appear in any jstack snippet taken of the Solr 5 thread, when
‘score’ is also asked for.
Trying to look a bit into the code, I see that in solr 8 the calculation of
score “if needed” is performed as a separate phase, after the document
collection flow (might be that its like collecting the documents again in a
way? I/O etc. ) :
org.apache.solr.search.Grouping.execute():
if (!collectors.isEmpty()) {
Collector secondPhaseCollectors =
MultiCollector.wrap(collectors.toArray(new Collector[collectors.size()]));
if (collectors.size() > 0) {
if (cachedCollector != null) {
if (cachedCollector.isCached()) {
cachedCollector.replay(secondPhaseCollectors);
} else {
signalCacheWarning = true;
log.warn(String.format(Locale.ROOT, "The grouping cache is active,
but not used because it exceeded the max cache limit of %d percent",
maxDocsPercentageToCache));
log.warn("Please increase cache size or disable group caching.");
searchWithTimeLimiter(luceneFilter, secondPhaseCollectors);
}
} else {
if (pf.postFilter != null) {
pf.postFilter.setLastDelegate(secondPhaseCollectors);
secondPhaseCollectors = pf.postFilter;
}
searchWithTimeLimiter(luceneFilter, secondPhaseCollectors); //->seems
to me this is the main document collection flow
}
if (secondPhaseCollectors instanceof DelegatingCollector) {
((DelegatingCollector) secondPhaseCollectors).finish();
}
}
}
for (@SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes"})Command cmd : commands) {
cmd.finish();
}
org.apache.solr.search.Grouping.CommandFunc:
@Override
@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked"})
protected void finish() throws IOException {
if (secondPass != null) {
result = secondPass.getTopGroups(0);
populateScoresIfNecessary();
}
org.apache.solr.search.Grouping.Command<T>:
protected void populateScoresIfNecessary() throws IOException {
if (needScores) {
for (GroupDocs<?> groups : result.groups) {
TopFieldCollector.populateScores(groups.scoreDocs, searcher, query);
}
}
}
I know that asking for the score has a cost of performance, but in Solr 5 it
didn’t seem to be meaningful and in Solr 8 it seems to be very expansive.
(In means of code, it seems the code is Solr 5 is different, I didn’t get into
finding exactly how and where it calculates the score to add to the document
upon request, but in means of timing, it doesn’t seem to have such an effect.)
Did anyone encounter such an issue ? is this a known issue started at a version
higher than 5 somewhen? Is there any configuration that might help ?
Thank you,
