Thanks, Deepak, We will try doing this. But still, I am wondering what led to the increase in response time this much from solr 6.5 to solr 8.7, keeping everything same. We are facing an increase of 100-150 ms.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:55 AM Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I were you, then I would stick to the 128 GB machine. And then look at > other parameters to tune... > > > Deepak > "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated > - Mahatma Gandhi" > > +91 73500 12833 > deic...@gmail.com > > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool > LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool > > "Plant a Tree, Go Green" > > Make In India : http://www.makeinindia.com/home > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 3:25 PM Satya Nand <satya.n...@indiamart.com > .invalid> > wrote: > > > Hi Deepak, > > > > We actually tried with 128 GB machine, Didn't help in response time. So > we > > moved back to 96GB. > > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:11 PM Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I am confused a bit about the maths: > > > > > > Heap-30 GB & Index Size-95 GB is equal to 125GB. And the RAM is 96GB. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Deepak > > > "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are > > treated > > > - Mahatma Gandhi" > > > > > > +91 73500 12833 > > > deic...@gmail.com > > > > > > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool > > > LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool > > > > > > "Plant a Tree, Go Green" > > > > > > Make In India : http://www.makeinindia.com/home > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:10 PM Satya Nand <satya.n...@indiamart.com > > > .invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We have recently upgraded solr from version 6.5 to version 8.7. But > > > > opposite to our expectations, the response time increased by 40 %. > > > > > > > > On solr 8.7 the difference between optimized and unoptimized index is > > > also > > > > very huge. 350 ms on optimized and 650 ms on unoptimized. The > > difference > > > is > > > > only 5 GB in size in cores of optimized and unoptimized. The segment > > > count > > > > in the optimized index is 1 and 20 in the unoptimized index. > > > > > > > > I wanted to ask, Is this normal behavior on solr 8.7, or was there > some > > > > setting that we forgot to add? Pleas also tell us how can we reduce > the > > > > response time in unoptimzed core. > > > > > > > > *Specifications* > > > > We are using master slave architecture, Polling interval is 3 hours > > > > RAM- 96 GB > > > > CPU-14 > > > > Heap-30 GB > > > > Index Size-95 GB > > > > Segments size-20 > > > > Merge Policy : > > > > > > > > <mergePolicyFactory > > > class="org.apache.solr.index.TieredMergePolicyFactory"> > > > > <int name="maxMergeAtOnce">5</int> <int > name="segmentsPerTier">3</int> > > </ > > > > mergePolicyFactory> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > --
