Thank you for your response.

-Rajeswari

On 7/19/21, 5:33 PM, "Yuval Paz" <yuval.p...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:

    Hello Rajeswari,

    As far as I know, Solr does not have a built in method to access a specific
    index.

    I can think in 3 ways to get the functionality you need:

    1. Create a custom document transformer that return a specific index from a
    multivalued field

    2. Create a custom query function to do that

    3. Store each value in its own field and add a copy field that unite them
    all:

      <field name="X_1" type="string" indexed="false" stored="true"/>
      <field name="X_2" type="string" indexed="false" stored="true"/>
      <field name="X_3" type="string" indexed="false" stored="true"/>
      <field name="X_4" type="string" indexed="false" stored="true"/>
      <field name="X" type="string" indexed="true" stored="false"
    multivalued="true"/>

      <copyField source="X_1" dest="X" />
      <copyField source="X_2" dest="X" />
      <copyField source="X_3" dest="X" />
      <copyField source="X_4" dest="X" />


    The third method is probably the best, as if you know the number of
    elements, it is not really a multivalued field, but a search on a multiple
    fields.


    If you don't mind changing the score a bit, another solution is to create 4
    fields(X_1/2/3/4), this time make them both indexed and stored, and create
    a field alias that will combine them all, then you can search on the field
    alias.

    On Mon, Jul 19, 2021, 10:11 PM Natarajan, Rajeswari
    <rajeswari.natara...@sap.com.invalid> wrote:

    > Hi,
    >
    > We have a multivakued field having always fixed number of values , 4 in
    > each multivalued field
    > For example
    > 1st doc
    > X = [“a” ,”ab
    > “ , “abc” , abcd”]
    >
    > 2nd doc
    > X=[“p”, “pq”, “pqr” , “pqrs”]
    >
    >
    > Is there a way we can get  , “a” , “p”  as a query result , “ab” , “pq”
    > as a query result   , based on the position in the list.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Rajeswari
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

Reply via email to