Hi Brend,

Thanks for the reply.

The errors I am getting,


INFO  - 2021-03-23 19:45:32.433; [c:solrcollection s:shard2 r:core_node4
x:solrcollection_shard2_replica2]
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor; Ignoring
commit while not ACTIVE - state: APPLYING_BUFFERED replay: false
INFO  - 2021-03-23 19:45:32.444; [c:solrcollection s:shard2 r:core_node4
x:solrcollection_shard2_replica2]
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor; Ignoring
commit while not ACTIVE - state: APPLYING_BUFFERED replay: false
INFO  - 2021-03-23 19:45:32.874; [c:solrcollection s:shard2 r:core_node4
x:solrcollection_shard2_replica2]
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor; Ignoring
commit while not ACTIVE - state: APPLYING_BUFFERED replay: false
INFO  - 2021-03-23 19:45:33.031; [c:solrcollection s:shard2 r:core_node4
x:solrcollection_shard2_replica2]
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor; Ignoring
commit while not ACTIVE - state: APPLYING_BUFFERED replay: false
INFO  - 2021-03-23 19:45:33.331; [c:solrcollection s:shard2 r:core_node4
x:solrcollection_shard2_replica2]
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor; Ignoring
commit while not ACTIVE - state: APPLYING_BUFFERED replay: false



On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 19:20, Bernd Fehling <bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> without any more info from your system and configs it is impossible to
> guess
> what the problem could be. But generally I can say that solrcloud 6.6
> has no problems with it, as I have a cloud with 5 shards and 2 replicas
> each
> on 5 nodes and a total of 260 mio. records.
> Somewhere between 1 to 3 tlog files and up to 50MB of size each.
>
> Bernd
>
> Am 23.03.21 um 10:40 schrieb Ritvik Sharma:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am facing an issue where the tlog size in each shard's replica is
> > increasing ~150GB where as actual index is ~40GB.
> >
> > I have enabled HardCommit also and passed* commit=true* while indexing
> the
> > data. Still no luck.
> >
> > Can you help in this regard?
> >
>

Reply via email to